<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open democracy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sedgemore.com/2010/03/open-democracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sedgemore.com/2010/03/open-democracy/</link>
	<description>physicist, journalist and science writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Sedgemore</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2010/03/open-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-5251</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Sedgemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=6912#comment-5251</guid>
		<description>But we taxpayers pay for those goons, and Charlie boy has business interests that benefit greatly from his royal position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But we taxpayers pay for those goons, and Charlie boy has business interests that benefit greatly from his royal position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SnoopyTheGoon</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2010/03/open-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-5250</link>
		<dc:creator>SnoopyTheGoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=6912#comment-5250</guid>
		<description>&quot;That’s because the move has so far barely been reported.&quot; 

Surely because the move itself falls under the same amendment. Anyway, the lack of publicity, as any stick, has two ends. Imagine royalty out of sight - what good it is to anyone? Clear road to a royalty-less republic, if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That’s because the move has so far barely been reported.&#8221; </p>
<p>Surely because the move itself falls under the same amendment. Anyway, the lack of publicity, as any stick, has two ends. Imagine royalty out of sight &#8211; what good it is to anyone? Clear road to a royalty-less republic, if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

