<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On chiropractic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/</link>
	<description>journalist and science writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Sedgemore - Spineless</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-3743</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Sedgemore - Spineless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=4432#comment-3743</guid>
		<description>[...] case of Simon Singh vs the British Chiropractic Association continues apace, with the noted science writer launching an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case of Simon Singh vs the British Chiropractic Association continues apace, with the noted science writer launching an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Sedgemore</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-3709</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Sedgemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 09:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=4432#comment-3709</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Go to http://www.chiro.org/research/ABSTRACTS/Infertility.shtml for a read.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Jesus wept!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Go to <a href="http://www.chiro.org/research/ABSTRACTS/Infertility.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.chiro.org/research/ABSTRACTS/Infertility.shtml</a> for a read.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Jesus wept!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Gilbey</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-3696</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Gilbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=4432#comment-3696</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I should point out that chiropracty actually does have &#039;scientific&#039; evidence/research in support of their claims.  

Go to http://www.chiro.org/research/ABSTRACTS/Infertility.shtml for a read.

However, if I may be permitted to borrow from Mr Spock (of Star Trek fame), &quot;It&#039;s scientific evidence, Francis, but not as we know it&quot;. 

Okay - I&#039;m off to look up the legal definition of &#039;tit&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I should point out that chiropracty actually does have &#8216;scientific&#8217; evidence/research in support of their claims.  </p>
<p>Go to <a href="http://www.chiro.org/research/ABSTRACTS/Infertility.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.chiro.org/research/ABSTRACTS/Infertility.shtml</a> for a read.</p>
<p>However, if I may be permitted to borrow from Mr Spock (of Star Trek fame), &#8220;It&#8217;s scientific evidence, Francis, but not as we know it&#8221;. </p>
<p>Okay &#8211; I&#8217;m off to look up the legal definition of &#8216;tit&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Sedgemore</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-3686</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Sedgemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=4432#comment-3686</guid>
		<description>It is most definitely immaterial in the current, legal context. And it is also immaterial unless one knows for sure what lies in the heart of each and every practitioner of the remedy under discussion.

As I said, Mr Justice Eady – the judge who, it should be recalled, found for Max Mosely in his libel suit against the News of the Screws – is a tit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is most definitely immaterial in the current, legal context. And it is also immaterial unless one knows for sure what lies in the heart of each and every practitioner of the remedy under discussion.</p>
<p>As I said, Mr Justice Eady – the judge who, it should be recalled, found for Max Mosely in his libel suit against the News of the Screws – is a tit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-3685</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=4432#comment-3685</guid>
		<description>&quot;Whether or not practitioners of the discipline set out to wilfully mislead their customers is immaterial.&quot;

I don&#039;t agree that it is immaterial. It would be even worse if chiropractors themselves believed their treatments were ineffective and harmful.

That being said, this isn&#039;t what Singh accused them of doing. In this case, it seems like the judge has misunderstood things badly, with regrettable effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whether or not practitioners of the discipline set out to wilfully mislead their customers is immaterial.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree that it is immaterial. It would be even worse if chiropractors themselves believed their treatments were ineffective and harmful.</p>
<p>That being said, this isn&#8217;t what Singh accused them of doing. In this case, it seems like the judge has misunderstood things badly, with regrettable effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispian Jago</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-3683</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispian Jago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 11:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=4432#comment-3683</guid>
		<description>Well summarised Sir.

http://crispian-jago.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well summarised Sir.</p>
<p><a href="http://crispian-jago.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://crispian-jago.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Sedgemore</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-3678</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Sedgemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 09:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=4432#comment-3678</guid>
		<description>But libel law, innit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But libel law, innit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadjo Dilo</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2009/05/on-chiropractic/comment-page-1/#comment-3677</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadjo Dilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 09:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=4432#comment-3677</guid>
		<description>So, if you&#039;re sincere about what you&#039;re doing then all is ok, you only shouldn&#039;t do it if you aren&#039;t. Oh, there are so many examples of sincere people doing very bad things that it would facile to mention them, innit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if you&#8217;re sincere about what you&#8217;re doing then all is ok, you only shouldn&#8217;t do it if you aren&#8217;t. Oh, there are so many examples of sincere people doing very bad things that it would facile to mention them, innit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

