David Cameron’s post-bureaucratic fantasy

Monday 27 April 2009 at 16:51 BST

David Cameron - post-bureaucratic fantasist

British Tory leader and likely future prime minister David Cameron made a speech yesterday in which he talked of the need for “a massive culture change at every level of government to make the state careful, not casual, with public money … a culture of thrift.”. This will be a “post-bureaucratic age”, says Cameron: one based on decentralisation, imagination and determination.

Chris Dillow asks the pertinent question:

“[I]sn’t there a little tension between wanting big and quick controllable cultural change on the one hand, and a ‘post-bureaucratic age’ on the other?”

I would say that yes, there is such a tension, and it applies to both the public and private sectors.

Cameron’s control urge, like that of many other top-table politicians, derives from a lack of trust which indicates an anti-libertarian bias. For all the slick PR designed to deflect attention from the Conservatives’ “Nasty Party” image of old, the Right Honourable David Cameron MP remains at heart an old-school, old-money Tory Toff.

In June of last year, Swedish economist Magnus Hansson described in his doctoral thesis how business productivity can increase in companies facing closure.

The reason Hansson put forward to explain this effect is that when management is distracted from daily operations, the employees of failing firms shoulder a greater responsibility for their work, and efficiency is thus enhanced.

Hansson’s focus was on the private sector, but over the years I’ve read of numerous failing public enterprises turned around by their workers when management executives were preoccupied with protecting their personal interests and stabbing each other in the back. I say we should let them get on with it; it’s probably cheaper in the long run, even with extravagant golden parachutes.

However, while the answer may be to manage less, many nominally libertarian politicians are reluctant to let go of the reins. That certainly goes for the Old Etonians currently waiting in the wings at Westminster, readying themselves for the implosion of New Labour.


  Feed the writer!   

Comments

  1. Alec

    I’m sorry, Francis, can I check that you’re not advocating a Tory Government?


  2. Francis Sedgemore

    You can.


  3. Alec

    Would you say in response, uh-huh or nuh-huh?


  4. Gadjo Dilo

    A “big and quick controllable cultural change” – that’s Stalinism, surely? 5-year plan, anybody?


  5. Francis Sedgemore

    “Would you say in response, uh-huh or nuh-huh?”

    Noo-nah. But then I could be lying, and secretly hoping for a Tory government on the grounds that it brings closer the political apocalypse and self-destruction of the so-called United Kingdom.

    Whatever my motives for commenting thus, I do regard a Tory victory in the next general election as inevitable. This is not Sweden, the English are weird, and you have to admit that social democracy as practised in these isles is a bit crap.


  6. Francis Sedgemore

    “that’s Stalinism, surely? 5-year plan, anybody?”

    Stalinism is putting it a little too strongly. I don’t think that a bunch of English public school graduates can hope to match Stalinism for ruthless efficiency and political competence.


  7. Alec

    Noo-nah would mean you ain’t not advocating it… please, this is important!


  8. Francis Sedgemore

    In that case I’m going to leave you hangin’ there, Alec. But don’t lose any sleep over it, there’s a good chap.