<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science lite or heavy &#8211; what would you prefer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sedgemore.com/2008/08/science-lite-or-heavy-what-would-you-prefer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sedgemore.com/2008/08/science-lite-or-heavy-what-would-you-prefer/</link>
	<description>physicist, journalist and science writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:34:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Sedgemore</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2008/08/science-lite-or-heavy-what-would-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Sedgemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=1749#comment-807</guid>
		<description>Bengt&#039;s link to the DIUS public consultation is welcome. If you have a few minutes to spare, I recommend that you have a look at that site, and maybe respond online to the questions posed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bengt&#8217;s link to the DIUS public consultation is welcome. If you have a few minutes to spare, I recommend that you have a look at that site, and maybe respond online to the questions posed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bengt</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2008/08/science-lite-or-heavy-what-would-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Bengt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=1749#comment-806</guid>
		<description>Dear Dr. Sedgemore,

I expect you have already studied the following link in detail:

http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/scienceandsociety/site/

Nonetheless I add the URL here since it ties in with your excellent discussion on science communication.

Med vänliga hälsningar, Bengt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dr. Sedgemore,</p>
<p>I expect you have already studied the following link in detail:</p>
<p><a href="http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/scienceandsociety/site/" rel="nofollow">http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/scienceandsociety/site/</a></p>
<p>Nonetheless I add the URL here since it ties in with your excellent discussion on science communication.</p>
<p>Med vänliga hälsningar, Bengt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Sedgemore</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2008/08/science-lite-or-heavy-what-would-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Sedgemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=1749#comment-803</guid>
		<description>Yes, I saw that piece - on ~10 year oscillations and stuff which could explain among other things why 2008 is relatively cool, and why we might see global cooling over the next 10–15 years, but  still have long term warming.

Absolutely brilliant science writing it is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I saw that piece &#8211; on ~10 year oscillations and stuff which could explain among other things why 2008 is relatively cool, and why we might see global cooling over the next 10–15 years, but  still have long term warming.</p>
<p>Absolutely brilliant science writing it is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://sedgemore.com/2008/08/science-lite-or-heavy-what-would-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedgemore.com/?p=1749#comment-802</guid>
		<description>See the article by Fred Pearce &amp; Michael Le Page in New Scientist last week for an example of how to communicate climate change without compromising the science...

http://tinyurl.com/5zals4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the article by Fred Pearce &amp; Michael Le Page in New Scientist last week for an example of how to communicate climate change without compromising the science&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/5zals4" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5zals4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

